Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic

Option-critic learns options: sub-policies together with a learned rule for when each one hands control back. Its headline result is that performance improves as options are added. We explain that result, with theory and experiment. First, the termination rule option-critic learns by maximising return contributes nothing. When the termination test and the policy that picks options read the same values, the test fires at every step, so the learned rule is identical to always terminating. When that policy explores and the test does not, as in option-critic itself, the rule can block the exploration; there are instances where it suffers $Ω(T)$ regret while always terminating holds to $O(\log...

AuthorsBingyun Liu, Yuheng Jing
Primary categorycs.LG
Published30 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b984b59b-965d-495f-a0ea-40d0fda16e43" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.