Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Load-Balancing Goes Too Far: Expert Pruning in Over-Dispersed Mixture-of-Experts Models

Expert pruning reduces the memory and serving cost of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models by removing low-importance experts identified by the router, assuming router probabilities provide a reliable importance signal. We observe that this assumption breaks down under over-dispersed routing, a regime associated with aggressive load-balancing during training, in which tokens are distributed nearly uniformly across experts and importance signals collapse. In this regime, perplexity does not predict downstream task accuracy: on gpt-oss-20B, the lowest-perplexity pruning configuration yields the worst mathematical reasoning, while the highest-perplexity configuration preserves it. This does not o...

AuthorsBerkcan Kapusuzoglu, Connor Pryor, Sangwoo Cho et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published3 September 2026
Last updated at source3 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a288c43e-2a92-4d8f-a27a-bae206727fe1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.