Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Systematic Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Consistency Enhancement Methods in Multilingual Language Models

Multilingual language models often produce inconsistent answers to semantically equivalent questions across languages, motivating methods to improve cross-lingual consistency (CLC). However, existing methods are typically evaluated using different models, tasks, and protocols, leaving their relative strengths unclear. In this work, we present a unified evaluation of representative CLC-enhancement methods for question answering, spanning inference-time interventions and post-training approaches across three model families and three closed-form benchmarks. The results show that post-training methods are generally more reliable, with direct distribution alignment consistently improving CLC a...

AuthorsJirui Qi, Mingyang Wang, Hinrich Schütze et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 September 2026
Last updated at source21 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/93f57329-6d63-4d52-9a18-7a1f01071e5b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.