Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Cross-Dataset Transfer and Reliability of Explainable Artificial Intelligence for RhythmFormer Remote Photoplethysmography

Background. Remote photoplethysmography estimates the cardiovascular pulse from facial video, and its explanations have rested on inspecting heatmaps rather than on quantitative evidence about where a model reads it. We quantified the explanations and asked whether such explanations transfer between datasets and track model performance. Method. We trained eight condition-specific RhythmFormer models on NCKU-rPPG, recorded under three illumination levels, speaking, rotation, and cycling, estimated one heart rate per 5.12-second clip, and set them beside a UBFC-rPPG reproduction. Raw attention, rollout, attention flow, and Beyond Intuition were assessed by skin coverage and the Salience-gui...

AuthorsLouis Chen, Torbjörn E. M. Nordling
Primary categorycs.CV
Published3 September 2026
Last updated at source3 September 2026
cs.CVcs.AIeess.IV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d74503eb-8390-4f43-9606-64571bf0cbf9" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.