Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Examining the Vulnerability of Multi-Agent Medical Systems to Human Interventions for Clinical Reasoning

Human interventions at fault points can alter the diagnostic accuracy of multi-agent medical systems. We defined fault points as moments in AI agent conversations, in which an agent's reasoning became most vulnerable to external influence. Using the MedQA dataset, this study analyzed simulated doctor-patient conversations to measure how interventions shifted reasoning and accuracy. Correct intervention methods showed an improvement in baseline diagnostic accuracy of up to 40%, while incorrect or bias-related interventions degraded performance by up to 6% and increased diagnostic drift and uncertainty. Beyond performance changes, our analysis revealed behavioral similarities between cognit...

AuthorsBenjamin C Liu, Dillon Mehta, Rishi Malhotra et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published2 September 2026
Last updated at source2 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e61a2a1e-89ca-4e0c-9f43-50fc833823d2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.