Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Modeling What Changes: Sparse, Residual World Models for Object-Centric Manipulation

Monolithic world models predict the entire next state at every step, spending capacity re-predicting the static majority of a scene and injecting error into it. We ask whether explicitly modeling change (a per-object change gate plus a residual delta head that perturbs only the objects the gate flags) is a more effective and interpretable bias for physical prediction and control. On a MuJoCo tabletop pushing benchmark scaling from 3 to 8 objects, the sparse/residual model predicts next-state poses 2.5 to 4.6 times more accurately than a dense multilayer perceptron at 8.6 to 11.1 times fewer parameters, sustains change-detection F1 of 0.80 to 0.87 where the dense baseline is degenerate, tr...

AuthorsParam Thakkar, Parsika Paresh Shah, Manisha Sushant Gote
Primary categorycs.RO
Published2 September 2026
Last updated at source2 September 2026
cs.ROcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/807873b4-1dbb-4a25-a3a4-6b06a09205fa" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.