Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Output Format Confounds Data Quality and Capability in Instruction Tuning

Instruction-tuning data are judged by quality metrics, and tuned models are judged by benchmarks, but both judgments pass through an output interface: the surface format in which an answer is written. Using gradient signatures across 12 tasks, four semantically equivalent interfaces, three model families, and controlled corruptions, we show that this interface confounds both measurements. Spectral statistics such as effective rank are provably invariant to interface rotation and empirically blind to semantic corruption, while the direction of the update carries the quality signal. The interface-varying residual is not noise: it identifies each unit's own target task perfectly across all t...

AuthorsChengguang Gan, Hanjun Wei, Yunhao Liang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published2 September 2026
Last updated at source2 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/da5181e9-1578-4a14-a2d1-5b8df5695fbd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.