Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Fast Do Agents Rot? An Empirical Study of Long-Horizon Degradation in LLM Agents for Production Decision-Making

Production deployments of large language model (LLM) agents remain unreliable on long, multi-step workflows even as benchmark success rates climb steadily. We argue this gap is largely an artifact of task horizon: benchmarks are dominated by short-to-medium horizons where success remains high, while production workloads demand an order of magnitude more dependent steps. We measure the effect directly, characterizing the shape of agent degradation and disentangling its cause across a large controlled study spanning nine models, six open models from 1.2B to 671B parameters, and three deployed proprietary systems; four task families, including a genuinely agentic tool-use loop; five horizons...

AuthorsShubhra Mittal
Primary categoryphysics.soc-ph
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source31 August 2026
physics.soc-phcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/71a6eab5-46d2-4399-a76b-47a2950a4ab7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.