Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Auditing Harness Tampering in Self-Improving Agents

Self-improving agents iteratively modify their own harness to push the frontier of their performance. However, such modifications can produce illusory performance gains or compromise integrity constraints such as authorization, provenance, and completeness without genuinely improving capability. We term this phenomenon as harness tampering, which extends the concept from reward and measurement tampering to the full self-improvement lifecycle. To systematically study this problem, we propose a two-axis taxonomy that categorizes each misaligned edit by the harness functional role in which it occurs and the obligation it violates. Then we build an annotated corpus by seeding tampered-benign ...

AuthorsXing Wang, Xiaoyi Zhang, Jie Shao
Primary categorycs.CL
Published30 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/94c5ecc5-8000-485f-9753-a3dedacd5568" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.