Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning to Evaluate Before Improving: Automatic Rubric Induction for Automatic Research Agents

Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experimentation, and report generation. However, open-ended research tasks often do not clearly specify the analyses, methods, and success criteria required to complete the task. As a result, agents may miss important analyses, use inappropriate methods, or draw conclusions that are insufficiently supported by evidence. To address the problem, we present AutoSciRub, an evaluation-first framework that induces a task-specific executable rubric before research execution, and uses it to guide execution, criterion-level verification as well as iterative...

AuthorsXuehai Wang, Haowei Qin, Tongxin Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source31 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.LGcs.MAcs.SE
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b45889ba-bfc8-4ea3-95d8-b683868efa51" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.