Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating and Improving LLM Self-Modeling

We study self-modeling: an LLM's ability to answer questions about its own behavior. We focus on verifiable behavioral questions, such as whether a prompt edit would change the model's final answer. To measure this capability, we introduce a benchmark that tests diverse types of self-modeling questions. Current models show non-trivial but limited self-modeling skill, and make systematic mistakes on simple counterfactual questions about their own behavior. To improve self-modeling skill, we develop a scalable synthetic-data pipeline that produces self-modeling training data, and show that reinforcement-learning can improve aggregate self-modeling skill across three open-source model famili...

AuthorsSiqi Zeng, Andre N. Assis, Rowan Wang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source31 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/86f69de4-7a6f-4b79-b6b8-6ec07b33a265" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.