Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Aggregate Disambiguation Systems

Natural-language tasks can elicit different verdicts from protocol-following evaluators that receive the same declared information. We study aggregate disambiguation systems (ADSs). Given a task and a candidate solution, each evaluator casts a binary vote on whether the solution should be accepted, and the system aggregates the votes of a finite panel. The target is protocol reproducibility relative to an explicitly declared evaluator reference, not semantic truth. We separate fixed finite censuses, probabilistic evaluator populations, and growing-census limits, since their endpoint laws and guarantees are not interchangeable. In the population setting, we use finite samples to estimate h...

AuthorsJosé María Lago, Albert Castellana, Edgars Nemše
Primary categorystat.ME
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source31 August 2026
stat.MEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/81e78bd3-caa9-4b23-bd65-e08efc23c327" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.