Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mind the Gap: Theory-of-Mind-Grounded Friction for Epistemic Alignment

Productive dialogue alignment requires distinguishing \emph{surface coordination} (acknowledgments and smooth task progression) from \emph{epistemic alignment} (convergence of belief states); standard preference-based methods typically optimize response-level preferences without explicitly modeling the latter. We operationalize Theory-of-Mind (ToM) inference as a control signal within Frictive Policy Optimization by extracting, at each referring expression, a four-part belief structure: the speaker's intended referent, the addressee's interpretation, and each participant's model of the other's belief. This makes friction mechanically computable from epistemic-state comparisons, capturing ...

AuthorsYifan Zhu, Kyeongmin Rim, James Pustejovsky
Primary categorycs.CL
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source18 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/938ad03c-2a88-4f10-8bda-c3bc311e0056" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.