Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Graph Evidence Is Not Enough: Diagnosing Native Decoder Use in Graph-Augmented LLMs

Graph-augmented large language models often assume that graph evidence produced by external computation and placed in the input can be used by the native decoder. We test this assumption with HopQA, a deliberately bounded diagnostic that asks for the shortest-hop distance between two query nodes. Because the answer is a small integer and the target is purely topological, failure cannot be dismissed as open-ended generation or ambiguous evaluation. Yet existing graph-augmented baselines still fail on this setting, showing that providing graph evidence is not the same as making it usable. We introduce an intervention triangle with three matched conditions: readable graph evidence, shuffled ...

AuthorsXiaoyu Guo, Pengcheng Chen, Jiong Yu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published31 August 2026
Last updated at source1 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc7722a7-98db-4abc-ae35-ddac0b18f101" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.