Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science

Academic reviews, scholarly commentaries, and book reviews serve as sources of evaluative statements about theories, methods, literature, institutions, and policies, providing valuable evidence for scholarly evaluation. Existing scientific entity extraction methods mainly target research articles and are less effective for evaluation objects, which are often abstract, context-dependent, and characterized by ambiguous type boundaries. This study proposes an ontology-guided multi-agent framework for evaluation object extraction. The framework combines candidate discovery, ontology-constrained classification, and domain review. Experimental results show that it achieves a Precision of 90.33%...

AuthorsHaolin Chen, Hongyi Dong, Yu Zhu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published30 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/eca04823-6e92-43fd-bda4-45765f8ea53c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.