Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

MUDDLE: Measuring Understanding of Documents under Distractor and Length Effects

Document question-answering systems increasingly answer questions over collections of retrieved documents rather than one clean source, so robustness to distracting context matters as much as reading ability. When such systems fail, it is often unclear whether the context was too long or the distractors were too close to the topic, because prior work tends to conflate these two effects. We present MUDDLE, a controlled benchmark that separates them. MUDDLE uses 270 human-annotated questions, each tied to a single source document, and instantiates every question in five conditions: the source alone, the source with two or four topically similar hard negatives, and the source with two or fou...

AuthorsJason Luo, Saibilila Abudukelimu, Judy Song et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published30 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b513217f-e1be-45f1-9381-3d4892d06860" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.