Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

JudgePanel: A Compact Judge with Panel Deliberation via Adaptive Multi-Reward Reinforcement Learning

The LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm has emerged as a scalable alternative to human evaluation. However, single-model judges are limited by their inherent model biases, while multi-agent evaluation protocols that mitigate this through diverse deliberation are prohibitively expensive at inference time. To this end, we propose \textbf{\modelname}, which equips a compact \underline{Judge} model with multi-agent \underline{Panel} deliberation capability. Specifically, we first train on panel deliberation traces from an ensemble of strong evaluators, capturing structured patterns of discussion, disagreement, and resolution. To further improve judgment quality beyond SFT, we introduce \textit{AdaReward}...

AuthorsYiyue Qian, Shinan Zhang, Huan Song et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published29 August 2026
Last updated at source29 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9d6f5457-983f-4ed3-a92d-0459d8fbe47e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.