Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Can Conditional Flow Matching Replace Pointwise Negative Log-Likelihood?

Flow matching enables likelihood-free training, yet alignment methods increasingly reuse conditional flow matching (CFM) losses as endpoint negative log-likelihoods (NLLs) and their old/new differences as log-likelihood ratios. We characterize when these substitutions are valid. For linear Gaussian paths, we exactly decompose endpoint NLL into entropy, a weighted CFM objective, an interior velocity--score residual, and a boundary residual. Thus CFM-only estimates and differences are exact only when the corresponding residuals cancel. At the off-policy population optimum, ordinary CFM is not generally a pointwise NLL estimator, whereas \(w_{\mathrm{sc}}(t)=(1-t)/t\) removes the interior re...

AuthorsYansen Han, Hongxin Sun, Tao Lin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 August 2026
Last updated at source6 September 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/72dec6e7-48eb-4a10-9bfd-3b23f7482b28" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.