Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Auditing generative audio calls for known-task audio-llm evaluation

Speech and audio LLMs are evaluated by comparing waveform predictions with predictions from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcript. For fixed closed-set tasks, this conflates acoustic evidence with the need to invoke a generative audio model. We estimate incremental call value with matched selectors sharing pre-call evidence. Each policy may retain the transcript label, use a local encoder, or invoke a generative model; matched control removes generative actions but preserves pre-call evidence and development selection. On VocalSound, transcript-only accuracy is 0.296, while supervised CLAP and WavLM controls reach 0.850 and 0.854 without calls. Full selector reaches 0.925 at 12...

AuthorsMengzhe Geng
Primary categorycs.SD
Published28 August 2026
Last updated at source7 October 2026
cs.SDcs.CLeess.AS
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ceb56abf-c5fc-494f-9e0d-fcd1c3e74e36" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.