Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Tainted Pixels Expose Deepfake Videos?

Publicly-acceesible face-manipulation tools have made deepfake creation accessible to non-expert users. Against these, existing defenses are mostly post-hoc, detecting only after forgery has occurred, and operating on still images rather than videos. Research is lacking in i) the proactive protection of published facial videos against black-box manipulation tools, and in (ii) understanding its perceptual effect on human viewers. We introduce TaintedPixels, a proactive video-protection method built around an asymmetric visibility trade-off: the embedded watermark should remain inconspicuous in the published video but become obvious once a downstream tool manipulates the video. TaintedPixel...

AuthorsJuan Hu, Shaojing Fan, Sanjay Saha et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published26 August 2026
Last updated at source26 August 2026
cs.CRcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b00df686-db38-4021-bc78-9c781e0aed86" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.