Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Counterfactual Bias Testing for Application Tracking System

Automated candidate-job matching systems are increasingly classified as high-risk AI under emerging regulation, yet auditing them for demographic bias is expensive: classical correspondence-audit studies require hand-crafted resumes and manual submission, which does not scale to fast pipeline retraining cycles. This paper presents a general, reusable methodology that (1) uses task-specialized LLM agents to synthesize identity-neutral base resumes and inject controlled demographic treatments across five protected-characteristic axes (sex/gender, age, residence, language, disability), producing a K x (1+N) correspondence-audit matrix; (2) qualitatively flags inferred protected characteristi...

AuthorsSai Yashwant, Shruti Bansal, Anurag Dubey et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published27 August 2026
Last updated at source27 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bab661d5-9ed4-40c4-85cc-0b16ada92c15" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.