Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Indistinguishability of Human v/s AI Generated Text

The rapid improvement of LLMs has made distinguishing AI-generated text from human writing a pressing problem. This challenge is further amplified by paraphrasing tools designed to make machine-generated text appear more "human". We study how access to human writing samples can be used to strategically paraphrase machine-generated responses toward the human distribution. Under a multi-sample setting with human and machine responses to the same prompts, we show that repeated paraphrasing moves the machine distribution toward the empirical human distribution under simple mixing and stability conditions. Our results derive an explicit convergence rate, extend the analysis to a finite-sample ...

AuthorsJaee Ponde, Aritra Das, Mihir More et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published27 August 2026
Last updated at source27 August 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/79b6aee8-9b2a-4ea7-a3dc-199d6db670f0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.