Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Assessing the Downstream Utility of Evidence-Aware Retrieval in RAG

Retrieval evaluation for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is increasingly designed around whether retrieved passages contain evidence that can support generation, rather than topical relevance alone. We study whether this closer alignment with downstream evidence needs also makes retrieval evaluation more useful for the decisions built from it. Across five retrieval benchmarks and an end-to-end TREC RAG 2025 setting, we examine an answer-support signal in four roles: comparing retrievers, guiding retrieval training and system selection, predicting downstream answer quality, and filtering the evidence supplied to a generator. The signal changes retrieval rankings, but its downstream va...

AuthorsUtshab Kumar Ghosh, Debayan Mukhopadhyay, Shubham Chatterjee
Primary categorycs.IR
Published26 August 2026
Last updated at source26 August 2026
cs.IRcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b5f058f2-d996-491d-b138-97d045bda65a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.