Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Refusal Is Not Robustness: Auditing Confident Fabrication in Large Language Models on a Provably Uninformative Clinical Pain Speech Transcript

Hallucination and abstention benchmarks rarely establish that a model could not have known the correct answer, making it difficult to distinguish appropriate abstention from an unsupported prediction. Seven large language models were evaluated on the TAME Pain speech corpus. Participants read phonetically balanced Harvard Sentences while one hand was immersed in cold or warm water and reported pain only during periodic pain statements. This protocol generated 5,750 no signal Harvard Sentence utterances whose transcripts contained no lexical pain information and 1,294 signal pain statement utterances in which the pain rating was explicitly spoken. In the no signal arm, pain was recoverable...

AuthorsSagnik De, Sreenija Pavuluri
Primary categorycs.AI
Published16 July 2026
Last updated at source16 July 2026
cs.AIcs.ETcs.LGeess.AS
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/71da5c46-12f0-41fb-bf4c-55dc25292f38" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.