Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating Language Models in Realistic Conversational Contexts

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to serve open-ended, multi-turn interactions, evaluating conversational quality at human scale has become a central challenge. Existing evaluation frameworks built for summarization, translation, or short-form QA tasks fall short of adequately measuring the consistency of human-scale dialogue, especially when derivation and validation of these metrics themselves often rely on synthetic rather than human sources. We fill the gap by introducing UPHELD (UPwork Human-Scale Evaluated Long Dialogues), a large, reference-full benchmark for evaluating human-scale conversational ability beyond factual correctness. UPHELD consists of hundred...

AuthorsIlija Subasic, Andrew Rabinovich, Zhao Chen
Primary categorycs.CL
Published24 June 2026
Last updated at source24 June 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/73c98ef6-b62d-44fe-8b71-4cabcdec7e9d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.