Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Comparing Corrupted Constrained Learning Problems

A key result in statistics is the data processing inequality, originally proved by Blackwell (1951) and later refined by DeGroot (1962) in terms of statistical uncertainty. The latter statement claims that the Bayes risk achieved on raw data always undercuts the Bayes risk on a processed version of the same data. This seemingly contradicts empirical findings in machine learning: pre-training, representation learning, feature learning, data augmentation are techniques used to improve performance of machine learning models. We reconcile both worlds by simply accepting that machine learning problems are constrained learning problems: the model class used does not include all measurable funct...

AuthorsLaura Iacovissi, Rabanus Derr, Robert C. Williamson
Primary categorycs.LG
Published26 August 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.LGmath.STstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e5e6444b-d727-4aa3-aece-759c986f660e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.