Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

ReliableRAG: Combating Misinformation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Reliability-Guided Reasoning Chains

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful architecture for Question Answering (QA) by integrating external information into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, false, inaccurate, and misleading information in news and social media poses a serious challenge to real-world RAG systems, especially in multi-hop QA, where complex multi-step reasoning can be misled by even a single deceptive misinformation segment in the retrieved documents. Existing approaches mainly rely on implicit alignment or explicit regulation, but their limited ability to assess fine-grained information reliability makes them vulnerable to deceptive misinformation that is semantically relevant to ...

AuthorsJinpu Jiang, Xuan Wu, Wenhao Song et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published26 August 2026
Last updated at source26 August 2026
cs.CLcs.IR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a0665665-3b81-4fd2-9924-9e2a3fad5582" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.