Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Apples to Apples? Towards Comparable Crosslingual Language Model Evaluation

Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across lan...

AuthorsXiulin Yang, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Catherine Arnett
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 August 2026
Last updated at source30 August 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9560bd89-962e-4301-bf0d-8a7061395df5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.