Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Analyzing and Correcting Benevolence Bias in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as stand-ins for human respondents, from opinion polls and simulated survey participants to agent-based social simulations. These uses rest on one assumption: that conditioning a model on who a person is yields answers resembling those of real people from that group. Here we identify and measure benevolence bias, a small but consistent tendency for aligned LLMs to lean toward the kinder, safer, more socially approved answer on value-laden survey questions. Across 18 widely used models, four social-science datasets (ANES, GSS, WVS, and a cross-cultural prospect-theory replication) and six psychological categories, we find that the bias is ...

AuthorsYuanzi Li, Junhao Wang, Minghui Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published26 July 2026
Last updated at source26 July 2026
cs.HCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/80789bf4-d781-4ad8-8de2-6c1348811ffb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.