Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Reading Is Not Using: Retrieval, Judgment, and the Design of AI Financial Research Workflows

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as AI analysts to process financial disclosures and support AI-assisted investment decisions. Yet such systems are usually evaluated by what they can retrieve, not whether retrieved information affects their judgments. We identify a retrieval-integration gap in long-context financial analysis. Holding focal-firm information fixed and varying only unrelated context from 2,000 to 128,000 tokens, we find that a risk disclosure's influence on investment judgments falls to the experimental noise floor even as direct retrieval remains accurate. The pattern replicates across model families and judgment tasks and in experiments removing real ...

AuthorsMiao Liu, Zhizhe Liu
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 August 2026
Last updated at source25 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c772d269-8c29-4cb4-b3be-f2c266727dca" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.