Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

'Ghaib in Translation' aka Unseen Harm: Measuring Cross-Script Safety Inconsistency with 'Missed-in-Urdu' Scores in LLM Hate Speech Detection

Urdu, the world's tenth most spoken language with 246 million speakers, remains almost entirely absent from mainstream LLM safety evaluation and nine years of WOAH proceedings. To investigate whether this absence has measurable consequences for content moderation reliability, five large language models, GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Qwen-2.5, and Llama-3.1, were tested across six datasets spanning Nastaliq Urdu, Roman Urdu, English, and code-switched Urdu-English. Across the five Urdu-script datasets, label instability between original-script and English-translation classification ranged from 15.9% (Gemini 2.5 Flash) to 31.6% (Qwen-2.5), with a 'Missed-in-Urdu' rate, conten...

AuthorsFawzia Zehra, Kara-Isitt, Sonal Khosla et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 August 2026
Last updated at source9 September 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e1961745-5440-4cf4-85cf-bf2d1d60d127" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.