Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Much Regularization Survives Averaging? Update Masking in Federated Learning

Federated learning on non-IID data seeks flat minima to generalize across clients, and existing methods borrow sharpness-aware minimization from centralized training. There is a second way to reach flat minima, in which the regularization comes for free from noise added to the parameter updates, and it has never been carried over to the federated setting as an implicit regularizer. We show the reason. Masking charges the optimizer for moving in sharp directions. We prove that when each client draws its own mask, federated averaging weakens that charge by exactly the cohort size, and that giving every client the same mask brings it back by a factor equal to the inverse gradient diversity o...

AuthorsWenhao Yan, Fu Kuroda, Yucheng Jin et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published24 August 2026
Last updated at source25 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/746ab6bd-8125-4ee8-9c76-a77d64d90cb7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.