Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Who Pays More for Safety? Measuring the Disparate Cost of Safety Alignment across Languages

Safety alignment helps models adhere to human values, but it often reduces response utility. We ask a critical but understudied question: Does safety alignment impose the cost equally across language groups? To answer this, we introduce a rigorous protocol to measure the utility loss imposed solely by safety alignment, which we term Safety Cost. Through direct pairwise comparisons between safety-aligned models and their unaligned counterparts, we find a systematic inequity: non-English users consistently bear a higher Safety Cost than English users. We further identify three underlying patterns. First, multiple languages lie in a double-penalty zone, experiencing both weaker safety protec...

AuthorsChanwoong Yoon, Jungsoo Park, Alan Ritter
Primary categorycs.CL
Published23 August 2026
Last updated at source23 August 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d8694b69-2889-4341-ba7c-7d0d2e1cea81" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.