Paper · arXiv
LLM assisted writing deserves empirical evaluation
LLM-assisted writing is often treated as a detection problem, as it raises questions about clarity, integrity, equity, and evaluation. An analysis of 69,209 Health Informatics papers links it to more focused presentation, broader citation practices, and more globally distributed authorship. These patterns do not prove better science, but they support evaluating manuscripts by scholarly quality and accountability rather than by tool use.
| Authors | Xuan Zhong Feng, Yi Lin, Yiye Zhang et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 22 August 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 22 August 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.