Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Agentic Security: A Systematization of Tools, Failure Modes, and Design Laws for LLM-Driven Penetration Testing

Agentic security uses large-language-model (LLM) agents to plan, dispatch, and interpret security tools. As these systems move from demonstrations to deployed products, practitioners repeatedly encounter the same operational failures. We systematize these failures through a hands-on evaluation of ten widely used static, dynamic, cloud, orchestration, and AI red-teaming tools for unattended pipelines. We introduce a four-dimensional Integration Friction Index that separates one-time engineering cost from recurring organisational, legal, and maintenance cost. We then derive quantitative regularities that explain recurring failure modes. Modelling an agentic security system as stochastic LLM...

AuthorsIsrat Moyeen Noumi, Tarannum Ahmed Nowshin, Md. Mehedi Hasan Nipu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published16 August 2026
Last updated at source16 August 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.MA
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c59f823d-dff0-473f-94a4-f6faac38354a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.