Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

RAG Deserves an Index: Why Ingest-Time Compilation Beats Query-Time Interpretation

Nearly every retrieval-augmented question-answering system in production ships with a hidden interpreter: on each query a language model re-derives the meaning of raw corpus text and then throws that work away. Cheaper models do not close the gap: per-token prices have fallen by orders of magnitude while inference spend has risen, because context volume grows faster than prices fall. This is the modern equivalent of the full-table scan, and the remedy is the one databases found fifty years ago: do the expensive work once, at write time, into a maintained structure that makes reads cheap. A corpus whose read pattern is known before it ever meets a user can and should be indexed too. We cal...

AuthorsKyle Wild, Yusuke Takahashi, Asako Uraki
Primary categorycs.AI
Published21 August 2026
Last updated at source21 August 2026
cs.AIcs.DBcs.IR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ef94b905-1ae0-4c7f-8677-12506e690b63" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.