Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Toward Auto-Research: Mining Falsifiable Research Ideas from Paper Knowledge Graphs with Categorical Structure

Automated research-idea generation systems built on large language models (LLMs) share a structural weakness: they reduce ideation to free-text recombination, random paper pairing, or embedding-similarity retrieval. The three approaches fail in the same way: each treats a paper as a flat object, a string or a vector, and so quotients away the typed problem-method-metric-claim arrows a researcher actually uses when reasoning about a cross-domain analogy. We recover the missing structure with the minimal piece of category theory that a typed graph alone does not provide: composition, together with identity arrows, which makes it possible to ask whether a proposed analogy preserves relation ...

AuthorsYuchen Wang, Zhongzhi Luan
Primary categorycs.CL
Published17 June 2026
Last updated at source17 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/da2ed484-9acc-4dc0-9214-b23b698ab4dc" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.