Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Using Flow Matching on Tabular Data

Financial anomaly detection often relies on large unlabeled transaction logs, where anomalous samples may already be present during training. Such training-set contamination violates the clean-normal data assumption underlying many anomaly detection methods. Although flow matching has demonstrated strong performance in generative modeling, its robustness in unsupervised tabular anomaly detection remains underexplored. In this work, we study flow-matching-based anomaly detection under contaminated training data by comparing Time-Conditioned Contraction Matching (TCCM) with Forest-Flow and evaluating multiple anomaly scoring functions. Our results show that the choice of anomaly score is cr...

AuthorsPhilip Konz, Tejaswini Medi, Margret Keuper
Primary categorycs.LG
Published20 August 2026
Last updated at source20 August 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7d797ead-be5a-4e48-aef0-332258875ce5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.