Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Verifiable abstention makes AI leak diagnosis accountable in urban water distribution networks

Leak localization is usually evaluated as forced-choice prediction, although sparse hydraulic observations may not justify excavation. Here, we quantify a pressure-information limit and use it to recast localization as selective, evidence-gated decision-making. A physics-grounded executor falsifies competing leak, demand, sensor and valve hypotheses in a hydraulic twin. Deterministic code computes every number and every acceptance predicate; an independent large language model auditor may add a rejection but never overturn a failed check. Forced retrieval placed only 95 of 300 leaks in the correct zone. Across 550 mixed events, the gate acted on 223 (214 correct); on a third-party 33-leak...

AuthorsTianwei Mu, Yue Wang, Mingzhe Yuan et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published19 August 2026
Last updated at source1 September 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e8f67be1-67ad-4dc4-8136-89646ffc1011" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.