Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Execution-grounded evaluation reveals hidden failures in language-model calculations for environmental science

Large language models are increasingly used for quantitative work in the environmental sciences, yet existing evaluations score only final answers, leaving calculation process unobserved. Here we introduce AtmosCoder-Bench, an execution-grounded benchmark that makes the calculation process visible. Built through a transferable semi-automated pipeline (436 problems, 3,910 variants, 7,029 graded quantities), every problem is validated to be unambiguous and human-solvable, with uniquely verifiable answers. We find that (i) multiple-choice formats inflate measured accuracy by at least 12 percentage points; (ii) many failures arise not from missing knowledge but from models failing to apply kn...

AuthorsMaohao Ran, Chendong Ma, Yanting Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published19 August 2026
Last updated at source19 August 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9774ce36-3372-4cd0-9bac-2aacd7f5a691" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.