Judge, Retrieve, or Abstain: Uncertainty-Guarded LLM Judging with Provable Risk Guarantees
Using LLMs as judges has become standard practice for evaluating model outputs at scale. This is particularly common for subjective, open-ended tasks such as assessing helpfulness or alignment, where no single reference answer exists. However, objective tasks introduce a distinct reliability challenge for reference-free LLM judging. In the absence of a reference answer, the judge evaluates factual correctness either through its parametric knowledge or through tool augmentation. Although the former enables efficient evaluation, the judge may hallucinate or lack sufficient evidence for its verdict. Conversely, tool augmentation can provide additional evidence but introduces extra computatio...
| Authors | Sher Badshah, Ali Emami, Hassan Sajjad |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 18 August 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 18 August 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.