Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Evaluating the Diversity of AI-Generated Content with Diversity Profiles

Diversity is a fundamental criterion for evaluating generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, yet its measurement remains inherently ambiguous. Existing approaches typically represent generated samples in an embedding space, compute pairwise distances or similarities, and aggregate them into a single scalar score. Such scalar summaries are convenient, but they often encode different inductive biases and may yield contradictory rankings of the same sample sets. In this paper, we argue that diversity evaluation for AI-generated content is intrinsically under-specified when reduced to a single number. We first review representative diversity metrics, and then diagnose their limitation...

AuthorsXiuyuan Hu, Xuege Hou, Guoqing Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published18 August 2026
Last updated at source18 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7309b431-d0b5-48a7-aa9c-49df575801e9" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.