Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Aggregate Scores Miss: Measuring Item-Level Regressions in Commercial LLM API Migrations

Context: Software systems that depend on commercial large language model APIs must migrate to successor versions when vendors deprecate older models. Migration decisions typically rely on aggregate benchmark scores, which compress heterogeneous item-level behaviour into a single net figure. Objective: We measure what that compression conceals. Method: On three pairwise upgrades in the GPT-5.4 to GPT-5.6 Sol product sequence, we query 900 public benchmark items (graduate-level knowledge, olympiad mathematics, instruction following) 50 times per item per model, classify each item as reliably improved, reliably regressed, practically equivalent, or inconclusive under false-discovery-rate con...

AuthorsXiaonan Xu, Wenjing Wu
Primary categorycs.SE
Published18 August 2026
Last updated at source18 August 2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d0e2d72b-09c4-498a-98c9-b3b401938f36" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.