Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benchmarking Automated Security Patch Backporting: How Far Are We?

Automated security patch backporting is critical for mitigating N-day vulnerabilities. Recent tools report success rates above 80% on their respective datasets. However, these evaluations are often confined to homogeneous environments, such as one repository or specific project versions. Consequently, it remains unclear how well these tools generalize beyond their originally targeted scenarios. We present Porting Benchmark, a curated dataset of 1,234 security patch backporting cases spanning cross-version, cross-branch, and cross-repository scenarios, paired with a common evaluation framework. Using this benchmark, we evaluate five tools spanning program analysis, LLM prompting, and LLM a...

AuthorsJincheng Yang, Yulong Fu, Chengwei Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published18 August 2026
Last updated at source18 August 2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.CR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aa844bfb-3fa0-4e8b-8b3d-5b10a72b895a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.