Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Position: Fairness Failure in Generative Models is an Evaluation Problem

Despite groundbreaking advancements in generative models during the last decade, concerns about their lack of fairness, reinforcing societal inequalities and harming marginalized groups, remain under-addressed and difficult to act upon. This position paper argues that fairness failures in generative models, albeit driven by multiple factors, are ultimately stemming from an evaluation problem: fairness findings are rarely comparable across papers or actionable for deployment decisions. This paper diagnoses recurring empirical and conceptual failure modes in current practice and motivates a shift from ad-hoc bias checks to standardized, generative-specific evaluation. We propose Fairness Ca...

AuthorsMariia Vladimirova, Jean-Yves Franceschi, Thibaut Issenhuth
Primary categorycs.LG
Published17 August 2026
Last updated at source17 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bcee6310-2af1-42ce-b623-fbe4a25ef220" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.