Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Working Set of a Coding Agent: Coherence Debt in Repository-Scale Tasks

Repository-scale coding requires an agent to keep tests, imports, configuration, and migration rules consistent within a bounded context window. We model this as reconstructing a coupled-fact graph: at each edit, a required fact comes from recent context or parametric memory, and the facts covered by neither form coherence debt. We supply and withhold each channel and inject faults across seven models and five harnesses. As expected, no model completes a task on an unseen API with both channels empty, and putting the facts in the prompt restores success. When a rename defeats what models memorized about a real library, all seven fail in the same place, passing and missing the same tests. ...

AuthorsBardia Mohammadi, Lars Klein, Aman Chadha et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published17 August 2026
Last updated at source17 August 2026
cs.SEcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bf18d19f-8a8e-40be-934d-ca6a61294601" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.