Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

STAGE: Controlled Objective Admission for Multi-Preference LLM Alignment

Multi-preference alignment is often framed as scalarization: combine reward dimensions, then optimize. This leaves a temporal decision underspecified: when should each preference dimension enter policy optimization? We propose \methodname, a stability-guided active-set controller for controlled objective admission. \methodname starts from a small active set, retains admitted objectives, and expands when reward-deviation gates indicate low recent deviation or a patience budget is exhausted. A probing phase estimates a hard-to-easy order, and adaptive weighting emphasizes underperforming active dimensions. Automatic evaluations with 15 training preferences and 16 held-out benchmark columns ...

AuthorsYongqi Tong, Zhenyu Zhang, Ruirui Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published17 August 2026
Last updated at source17 August 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/71443bef-f872-40cb-aefd-84652b09c309" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.