Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Behaviour Is an Incomplete Measure of Reasoning Development: Cross-surface pre-arrival accessibility and the limits of developmental inference in a recurrent-depth reasoner

Capability development is routinely inferred from behavioural thresholds, from final checkpoints, or from what a decoder can read out of a hidden state. These quantities need not identify the same event. We study a 30M-parameter recurrent-depth relational reasoner in a closed, oracle-defined world, using dense behavioural trajectories, two training surfaces, preregistered pre-arrival hidden-state probes, prospectively checked evaluability, and explicit untrained and negative controls, holding the training-time and inference-time axes separate throughout. Behaviour first: under one frozen acquisition criterion, three-hop competence cost 70 logical epochs on the symbolic surface and 13,055 ...

AuthorsSimon Lam-Muir
Primary categorycs.LG
Published17 August 2026
Last updated at source17 August 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/73136016-9d54-47c0-a844-f7f1726183aa" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.