Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

One Score, Two Decisions: Selective Prediction on the Rare-Disease Tail

Given a patient's clinical findings, a diagnostic system ranks possible diseases and must decide when to endorse its first prediction or defer it for review. This decision is usually made by thresholding the top score. Selective prediction over ranked outputs begins with two checks. First, the ranker must produce enough correct top-ranked predictions to make the target feasible. Across 2,000 patient records stratified by disease prevalence, eight small open-weight LLMs achieve at most 4.6% Recall@1 on ultra-rare diseases. At 10% coverage, even a perfect confidence ranking of their existing predictions therefore cannot reach 50% selective accuracy. More accurate models pass the same check,...

AuthorsZhaoyang Jiang, Zhizhong Fu, Yunsoo Kim et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published5 August 2026
Last updated at source5 August 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e96f6510-694a-4b85-b6c2-e79ad0211f78" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.