Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Position: AI Agents in Scientific Teams Should Be Studied as Human-Agent Systems

Large language model-based agents are increasingly deployed as collaborators in scientific discovery yet most current work focuses on the autonomous capabilities of "AI Scientists". We argue that this overlooks the social aspects of scientific teamwork, and that studying AI Scientists as human-agent systems (HAS)--where the unit of analysis is the human-agent pair--is both underexplored and undervalued. We establish these points through literature and empirical analysis, and highlight recent incidences and studies which show that deploying agents in science without accounting for human-agent dynamics introduces near-term risks, including reduced diversity of scientific inquiry. Through an...

AuthorsPatrick Emami, Sameera Horawalavithana, Truc Nguyen et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published2 August 2026
Last updated at source2 August 2026
cs.AIcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fcfa734d-7dc5-4f60-b193-8484c4349039" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.